Wargaming could stop giving community contributors the ships before they’re released, but then WG loses the advertising and feedback mechanisms, community contributors lose their revenue, and players don’t get the info they want. My solution to this? Well I don’t really have one. The ship is released more powerful than it was originally intended to be. If the players like the changes to the ship, the ship gets released. ![]() Community contributors release an update to their reviews. The Ship’s release is delayed to make the changes.Ħ. To avoid taking a financial hit, they buff the ship whether it needed it or not. Oftentimes focusing on the bad or go batshit crazy about an *actual* or *perceived* weakness.ĥ. Community contributors share their opinions. This includes strengths and weaknesses of each ship.ģb. Community contributors tell the public everything about the ship. Ship reviews released by community contributors YT or on the blogs.ģa. New ships is given to supertesters and community contributors for testing/reviewing.ģ. Players get excited and want to know more.Ģ. ![]() This is a person that still insist the Atlanta is garbage and its one of my best ships. Every new premium ship or ship branch that is released follows a disturbingly familiar pattern:ġ. With all due respect to LWM, shes often wrong in my experience. You can’t blame WG for these buffs to premium ships.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |